Enersis: a turbulent capital increase (B): The role of communication in financial operations
On July 25, 2012, the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance (SVS), Chile’s financial regulator, published a material event notice on its website regarding Enersis, Latin America’s largest private electricity company, controlled by the Italian-Spanish multinational Endesa. The company surprised insiders and outsiders alike by calling an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting (ESM) to vote on a US$8.02 billion capital increase, to be held 50 days later on September 13. It would be the largest capital increase in Chile’s history, for an amount equivalent to 13.3% of the national budget.
Before the operation was announced, there were two views within the company. The Finance Department believed that the operation should go ahead without informing any of the stakeholders, since it was a win-win proposition, all the paperwork was in order, and they only needed to convince 6% of the minority shareholders. Conversely, the Communications Department, aware that Endesa’s entry into the country ten years earlier had been traumatic and had left wounds among the minority shareholders, argued that they should build a consensus before launching the operation.
Part A presents the dilemma, while Part B describes the events that transpired and how the operation ended, as well as identifying some of the lessons learned.
Before the operation was announced, there were two views within the company. The Finance Department believed that the operation should go ahead without informing any of the stakeholders, since it was a win-win proposition, all the paperwork was in order, and they only needed to convince 6% of the minority shareholders. Conversely, the Communications Department, aware that Endesa’s entry into the country ten years earlier had been traumatic and had left wounds among the minority shareholders, argued that they should build a consensus before launching the operation.
Part A presents the dilemma, while Part B describes the events that transpired and how the operation ended, as well as identifying some of the lessons learned.
Collection: IESE (España)
Ref: DPO-865-E
Format: PDF
Number of pages: 15
Publication Date: Jun 19, 2024
Language: English, Spanish
What material is included in this case:
Description
On July 25, 2012, the Superintendency of Securities and Insurance (SVS), Chile’s financial regulator, published a material event notice on its website regarding Enersis, Latin America’s largest private electricity company, controlled by the Italian-Spanish multinational Endesa. The company surprised insiders and outsiders alike by calling an Extraordinary Shareholders’ Meeting (ESM) to vote on a US$8.02 billion capital increase, to be held 50 days later on September 13. It would be the largest capital increase in Chile’s history, for an amount equivalent to 13.3% of the national budget.
Before the operation was announced, there were two views within the company. The Finance Department believed that the operation should go ahead without informing any of the stakeholders, since it was a win-win proposition, all the paperwork was in order, and they only needed to convince 6% of the minority shareholders. Conversely, the Communications Department, aware that Endesa’s entry into the country ten years earlier had been traumatic and had left wounds among the minority shareholders, argued that they should build a consensus before launching the operation.
Part A presents the dilemma, while Part B describes the events that transpired and how the operation ended, as well as identifying some of the lessons learned.
Read more
Before the operation was announced, there were two views within the company. The Finance Department believed that the operation should go ahead without informing any of the stakeholders, since it was a win-win proposition, all the paperwork was in order, and they only needed to convince 6% of the minority shareholders. Conversely, the Communications Department, aware that Endesa’s entry into the country ten years earlier had been traumatic and had left wounds among the minority shareholders, argued that they should build a consensus before launching the operation.
Part A presents the dilemma, while Part B describes the events that transpired and how the operation ended, as well as identifying some of the lessons learned.
Geographic Setting: Chile
Industry Setting: Energy and environment
Learning Objective
The case raises the question of what role communication should play in a complicated financial operation, underscoring the importance of building alliances with stakeholders rather than ignoring them and acting with corporate arrogance. It is suitable for use in a corporate communication course.
Leave your rating
"Enersis: a turbulent capital increase (B): The role of communication in financial operations"
Register for free with IESE Publishing and enjoy all the advantages
What type of account do you want to create?
Choose account type

