Midwest Industrial Components: Betting on humanoid robots: A CEO's decision on responsible AI adoption
Midwest Industrial Components (MIC) is a privately held U.S. industrial manufacturer with annual revenues of approximately $780 million. MIC supplies precision mechanical components to customers in the automotive, HVAC, agricultural machinery, and industrial equipment industries. MIC has long been recognized for its ability to handle high-mix, medium-volume production. The company has built its competitive position on flexibility, engineering expertise, and close customer relationships. However, by 2025, this model was under growing strain.
MIC faces persistent labor shortages, rising overtime and injury rates, and declining on-time delivery performance. Despite sustained investments in traditional automation, large portions of its operations—particularly machine tending, unstructured material handling, inspection, and final assembly—remain dependent on human judgment and dexterity. As labor availability tightens and customer expectations increase, these operational bottlenecks are becoming more costly and harder to manage.
Against this backdrop, MIC’s CEO, Sarah Whitaker, must decide whether to proceed with Apptronik's proposal to deploy humanoid robots in a pilot program. The proposal involves an 18-month pilot with 20 robots across two plants: Bloomington, MIC’s most critical manufacturing facility, and Evansville, a lower-risk site focused on assembly preparation and material handling. The pilot would cost approximately $11 million and would be offered as a subscription service, including hardware, software, and on-site support.
The robots are expected to fill labor gaps, reduce physical strain on operators, and stabilize throughput in selected workflows. Apptronik estimates 10–20% productivity improvements in targeted areas, labor redeployment equivalent to 75–100 full-time operators, and modest reductions in injury exposure. However, these benefits are uncertain. The robots are early-stage technologies with limited track records of sustained performance.
What material is included in this case:
Description
Midwest Industrial Components (MIC) is a privately held U.S. industrial manufacturer with annual revenues of approximately $780 million. MIC supplies precision mechanical components to customers in the automotive, HVAC, agricultural machinery, and industrial equipment industries. MIC has long been recognized for its ability to handle high-mix, medium-volume production. The company has built its competitive position on flexibility, engineering expertise, and close customer relationships. However, by 2025, this model was under growing strain.
MIC faces persistent labor shortages, rising overtime and injury rates, and declining on-time delivery performance. Despite sustained investments in traditional automation, large portions of its operations—particularly machine tending, unstructured material handling, inspection, and final assembly—remain dependent on human judgment and dexterity. As labor availability tightens and customer expectations increase, these operational bottlenecks are becoming more costly and harder to manage.
Against this backdrop, MIC’s CEO, Sarah Whitaker, must decide whether to proceed with Apptronik's proposal to deploy humanoid robots in a pilot program. The proposal involves an 18-month pilot with 20 robots across two plants: Bloomington, MIC’s most critical manufacturing facility, and Evansville, a lower-risk site focused on assembly preparation and material handling. The pilot would cost approximately $11 million and would be offered as a subscription service, including hardware, software, and on-site support.
The robots are expected to fill labor gaps, reduce physical strain on operators, and stabilize throughput in selected workflows. Apptronik estimates 10–20% productivity improvements in targeted areas, labor redeployment equivalent to 75–100 full-time operators, and modest reductions in injury exposure. However, these benefits are uncertain. The robots are early-stage technologies with limited track records of sustained performance.
Learning Objective
This case study is designed to help participants explore the process of making executive decisions in situations of technological uncertainty, where quantitative analysis is necessary but insufficient to determine the outcome. The primary pedagogical objective is to examine how leaders should evaluate emerging technologies, such as humanoid robotics, when performance, cost, and reliability are still evolving and organizational and human factors play a decisive role.
Specifically, the case enables participants to:
- Understand the limits of traditional automation in high-mix, medium-volume manufacturing environments, and
- Recognize why labor-dependent bottlenecks persist despite sustained investment.
- Assess early-stage technology investments using imperfect data and distinguish between financial ROI, learning value, and strategic optionality.
- Distinguish between reversible and irreversible risks, including financial exposure, operational disruption, workforce trust, and long-term competitive positioning.
Integrate quantitative and qualitative considerations such as labor economics, downtime and utilization constraints, injury reduction, organizational readiness, and global competitive dynamics.
They can also evaluate pilot design choices, including scope, site selection, and exposure of core operations, as well as how these choices influence learning speed and risk.
Recognize the role of leadership judgment in managing stakeholder perceptions, aligning the organization around experimentation, and balancing innovation with responsibility.
This case study is not intended to teach robotics engineering or identify a "correct" investment decision. Rather, it encourages discussion about how executives should act when the economics are promising but uncertain, waiting is a strategic choice, and learning early is as valuable as immediate financial returns.
Leave your rating
"Midwest Industrial Components: Betting on humanoid robots: A CEO's decision on responsible AI adoption"
Register for free with IESE Publishing and enjoy all the advantages
What type of account do you want to create?
Choose account type
Professors
Academic Institutions
Companies
Individuals