Oatly - Scaling a movement (A)
In late 2022, Oatly faced a difficult turning point. Only a year and a half after its IPO, the company had lost most of its market value and was struggling with the realities of scaling a fast-growing plant-based brand. Demand for oat milk was still strong, but Oatly’s manufacturing network could not keep up. Plants such as the Ogden facility ran below capacity, forcing the company to ship product from Europe at high cost. Logistics delays, rising oat and energy prices, and operational setbacks made margins collapse. Retailers were also pushing private-label oat milk, and foodservice partners like Starbucks were becoming more sensitive to reliable supply.
Inside the company, the strategy that once looked bold now appeared risky. Oatly had built an asset-heavy global footprint based on optimistic growth assumptions, including new factories in the United States, Europe, and China. When the category cooled and costs rose, the model became hard to sustain. The company also expanded its product portfolio, adding complexity to already strained plants.
By the end of 2022, leadership faced a fundamental choice. Should Oatly continue pursuing rapid global growth to defend its position against players like Danone, Nestlé, and private labels? Or should it slow down, protect margins, and stabilize its operations, even if that meant stepping back from the narrative that had defined the brand?
The case examines this tension between growth and viability, showing how a company built on cultural momentum must confront the discipline of operating as a public consumer-goods firm.
What material is included in this case:
Description
In late 2022, Oatly faced a difficult turning point. Only a year and a half after its IPO, the company had lost most of its market value and was struggling with the realities of scaling a fast-growing plant-based brand. Demand for oat milk was still strong, but Oatly’s manufacturing network could not keep up. Plants such as the Ogden facility ran below capacity, forcing the company to ship product from Europe at high cost. Logistics delays, rising oat and energy prices, and operational setbacks made margins collapse. Retailers were also pushing private-label oat milk, and foodservice partners like Starbucks were becoming more sensitive to reliable supply.
Inside the company, the strategy that once looked bold now appeared risky. Oatly had built an asset-heavy global footprint based on optimistic growth assumptions, including new factories in the United States, Europe, and China. When the category cooled and costs rose, the model became hard to sustain. The company also expanded its product portfolio, adding complexity to already strained plants.
By the end of 2022, leadership faced a fundamental choice. Should Oatly continue pursuing rapid global growth to defend its position against players like Danone, Nestlé, and private labels? Or should it slow down, protect margins, and stabilize its operations, even if that meant stepping back from the narrative that had defined the brand?
The case examines this tension between growth and viability, showing how a company built on cultural momentum must confront the discipline of operating as a public consumer-goods firm.
Learning Objective
This case helps students understand the tension between ambitious growth and operational viability in a young consumer-goods company. Oatly’s situation shows how a powerful brand narrative can run ahead of the organization’s real capabilities, and how difficult it becomes to correct course once fixed investments, public-market expectations, and retailer commitments are in place. The case allows participants to examine manufacturing strategy, capital intensity, category leadership, private-label competition, and the risks of scaling too quickly in an inflationary and supply-constrained environment.
Class discussion can focus on how leaders diagnose the root causes of strain, how they choose between protecting growth or protecting margins, and what strategic options remain once a company’s cost structure is misaligned with its story. It also invites a broader conversation about strategic viability and what it means for a mission-driven brand to operate as a public CPG company.
The case is suitable for MBA and Executive Education courses in Strategy, Growth and Scaling, General Management, and Operations. It works especially well in programs that deal with strategic inflection points, transformation, and the discipline of operating models in consumer industries.
There is a complementary B case with a 2026 update, which allows instructors to compare initial decisions with later outcomes and to deepen the discussion on strategic adjustment and long-term viability.
Leave your rating
"Oatly - Scaling a movement (A)"
Register for free with IESE Publishing and enjoy all the advantages
What type of account do you want to create?
Choose account type
Professors
Academic Institutions
Companies
Individuals