Esta web utiliza cookies técnicas, de personalización y de análisis, propias y de terceros, para anónimamente facilitarle la navegación y analizar estadísticas del uso de la web. Obtener más información
Resultados de búsqueda
-
RiskMetrics Group
Lorsch, Jay W.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-410008-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasRiskMetrics Group, a risk and governance consultancy, had a great deal of influence on U.S. companies. This case examines the history and growth of the company, the governance services it offers, the extent of its impact on shareholders, the controversy surrounding its conflicts of interest, and the impact it has had on directors.Desde 8,20 €
-
Relational Investors and Home Depot (B)
Lorsch, Jay W.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-409082-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasDesde 5,74 €
-
Rebranding at Oliver Wyman Group
Eccles, Robert G.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-409055-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasIn 2007, the individual consulting firms loosely held under the name Mercer Specialty Consulting came together more closely to form the $1.5 billion strategy consulting firm Oliver Wyman. CEO John Drzik hoped that this rebranding effort would create greater alignment and collaboration across the firm, resulting in greater client value. With increasingly complex needs, clients sought consultants with deep expertise to solve their most challenging ...Desde 8,20 €
-
One Firm One Future at Davis Langdon (C)
Eccles, Robert G.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-411008-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasDesde 5,74 €
-
Executive Remuneration at Royal Dutch Shell (B)
Lorsch, Jay W.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-409127-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasAt the 2009 Shell annual meeting, the majority of shareholders vote against the exclusive pay package. The B case compares the remuneration committee perspective (and their rationale for using discretion to award the bonuses) as well as the shareholder perspective (and their rationale for reacting so strongly against the pay package).Desde 5,74 €
-
One Firm One Future at Davis Langdon (B)
Eccles, Robert G.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-411007-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasDesde 5,74 €
-
Relational Investors and Home Depot (A)
Lorsch, Jay W.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-409076-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasIn 2006, amidst shareholder upset over CEO Robert Nardelli's compensation and Home Depot's declining stock price, Relational Investors decided to further investigate the situation. As experts in turning around underperforming and undervalued companies, Relational's principals saw opportunities for Home Depot to improve its stock price through changes in strategy, corporate governance and capital allocation. In particular, Relational felt Nardelli...Desde 8,20 €
-
Executive Remuneration at Royal Dutch Shell (A)
Lorsch, Jay W.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-409126-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasThe remuneration committee at Shell decided to exercise their discretionary power to award five top executives a bonus for 2008, even though they had not met the necessary performance measures under the compensation plan. Proxy advisors RiskMetrics and the British Association of Insurers advise their clients to vote against the plan at the upcoming 2009 annual meeting. The Shell remuneration committee wonders how the shareholders will react.Desde 8,20 €
-
One Firm One Future at Davis Langdon (A)
Eccles, Robert G.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-411006-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasThis case is accompanied by a Video Short that can be shown in class or included in a digital coursepack. Instructors should consider the timing of making the video available to students, as it may reveal key case details. Senior Partner Rob Smith just led construction consultancy firm Davis Langdon through a major organizational change in Europe and the Middle East. In the past, compensation arrangements had not incentivized partners to collabor...Desde 8,20 €
-
The Role of the Audit Committee in Risk Oversight
Lorsch, Jay W.; Simpson, KaitlynCaso HBS-409016-ELiderazgo y Dirección de personasAn audit committee chair considers how he can help his committee become more effective given the increasing regulatory demands on audit committees. He also wrestles with the lack of specificity in audit committee duties and whether his committee should take on additional responsibilities. In particular, he considers the growing concern over risk oversight and wonders what kinds of risks the audit committee should consider and whether they should ...Desde 8,20 €