Bargaining Under Bilateral Monopoly
This technical note introduces the economics of bilateral monopoly, a market structure in which a single seller faces a single buyer. Unlike competitive markets, bilateral monopoly produces no unique equilibrium price; instead, it generates a range of mutually beneficial outcomes, the contract zone, whose boundaries are determined by each party's outside options. The note explains why standard supply-and-demand analysis cannot predict the settlement within this range and examines the forces that shape it: threat points and how they shift with changing alternatives, focal points and precedent as coordination devices, self-serving bias as a source of disagreement over fairness, asymmetric information as a cause of avoidable impasse, and strategic delay as a costly signaling mechanism. The note builds on the competitive market framework presented in "The Economics of Competitive Markets" (UVA-GEM-0180) and the monopoly analysis in "Imperfect Competition and Monopolies" (UVA-GEM-0105). It is designed for use in MBA electives covering sports economics, labor economics, or negotiation, and pairs well with cases involving collective bargaining, supply chain negotiations, or merger transactions.
Collection: Darden University of Virginia (USA)
Ref: DARDEN-GEM-0257-E
Format: PDF
Number of pages: 9
Publication Date: Mar 19, 2026
Language: English
Description
This technical note introduces the economics of bilateral monopoly, a market structure in which a single seller faces a single buyer. Unlike competitive markets, bilateral monopoly produces no unique equilibrium price; instead, it generates a range of mutually beneficial outcomes, the contract zone, whose boundaries are determined by each party's outside options. The note explains why standard supply-and-demand analysis cannot predict the settlement within this range and examines the forces that shape it: threat points and how they shift with changing alternatives, focal points and precedent as coordination devices, self-serving bias as a source of disagreement over fairness, asymmetric information as a cause of avoidable impasse, and strategic delay as a costly signaling mechanism. The note builds on the competitive market framework presented in "The Economics of Competitive Markets" (UVA-GEM-0180) and the monopoly analysis in "Imperfect Competition and Monopolies" (UVA-GEM-0105). It is designed for use in MBA electives covering sports economics, labor economics, or negotiation, and pairs well with cases involving collective bargaining, supply chain negotiations, or merger transactions.
Read more
Leave your rating
"Bargaining Under Bilateral Monopoly"
Register for free with IESE Publishing and enjoy all the advantages
What type of account do you want to create?
Choose account type
Professors
Academic Institutions
Companies
Individuals