This website uses technical, customisation and analytical cookies, both first-party and third-party, to anonymously facilitate browsing and analyse statistics on use of the website. Learn more
SafeBlend Fracturing
-
Reference: HBS-914513-E
-
Year: 2013
-
Number of pages: 12
-
Geographic Setting: United States
-
Publication Date: Sep 23, 2013
-
Fecha de edición: May 28, 2014
-
Source: HBSP (USA)
-
Type of Document: Case
-
Industry Setting: Electric power generation;Natural gas;Electricity, gas, water & wastewater
Description
The CEO of SafeBlend Technologies must set a price for the company's environmentally friendly fracturing fluid additive. The firm is negotiating a new contract with its biggest client, Bristol Natural Gas. For the past two years, SafeBlend has been the sole provider of additives to Bristol due to aggressive negotiation and limited competition. New competitors are entering the market, and the CEO believes one competitor is prepared to offer Bristol a chemical-free additive for 50% less per gallon than SafeBlend. Anticipating lower bids from competitors, he considers reducing the price in the new contract to maintain the relationship with Bristol-despite the impact on revenue. However, the competition may not be able to supply enough additive to meet all of Bristol's needs, so he also considers the impact of setting a more competitive and profitable price that assumes losing only a portion of Bristol's business.